![]() The left-hand sidebar of Nautilus holds a shortcut to the Trash directory. The only evidence I found of the Trash is in the Nautilus file manager. However, there is no obvious place for the trash can. Items can still be deleted by selecting Move to Trash in the right-click menu. The omission of easily-accessible Trash is even more puzzling. Instead, you're left manually arranging applications across the other virtual desktops each and every time. The way GNOME 3 spawns new workspaces completely destroys that flow. A third desktop is set up for virtual machines, and a fourth handles terminal work. True power users often assign applications to open and run in desktops other than the one that's active.įor instance, in KDE, I use one desktop for Web surfing and office work, while my second desktop serves as a graphics studio for GIMP, Shutter, photo viewer, and color picker. Virtual desktops derive much of their utility based on the fact that there is a set number of them. ![]() While spawning workspaces as needed may appeal to users who only rarely use them, it leaves anyone accustomed to virtual desktops in the dark. Even though the desktop doesn't show any files, folders, or shortcuts, the desktop can still contain those items. Creating room for nothing and killing off functionality in the process seems pretty pointless to us.Įven more puzzling is the inclusion of a Desktop folder in the Home directory. Without a functional desktop, on-screen task management, or widgets, the GNOME 3 desktop is literally vacuous. ![]() Usually that's done to make room for something else, though. There is nothing wrong with creating some extra space. While the GNOME project succeeded in shoring up large plots of screen space, we can't help but ask why? From where we sit, the GNOME 3 desktop is completely empty. In some cases, they hit performance, too. While add-on docks are highly configurable and often gorgeous-looking, they lack the reliability and integration of a native task list. What's more, in an unfathomable showing of apathy, the official fix is to, one, deal with it, or two, install an aftermarket dock. It seems that no matter what type of system you use, GNOME Shell's design has serious issues. More severely, the ODT document file for this very article fell victim to the same phenomenon, causing version inconsistency among my systems. Without an on-screen task list, I had no indication KeePassX was still open. You see, after I got the password I needed from KeePassX on the Mini, the Web browser remained the focused full-screen application. Not remembering that I accessed KeePassX on the Mini, I had no idea what was causing the problem. Back on my desktop, KeePassX reported that my password database was locked. When I was finished, I closed the lid, suspending the Mini. At one point, I needed to open it on the Dell Inspiron Mini 10v to access my DropBox account via the Web. For instance, I use KeePassX as my password manager. I found that, without on-screen task management, I tended to forget which applications were left open. A task as simple as switching from the main Firefox window to the Downloads window requires two times as much clicking around.Īnother side-effect presents itself after a few weeks of regular use. This is a ghastly problem for anyone accustomed to multi-tasking. By incorporating application switching into the Activities overview, GNOME Shell places a serious burden on users.īefore you get to a usable task list, you have to click the Activities button (or move the cursor to the upper left-hand corner of the screen) any time you want to switch between applications. The lack of on-screen task management in GNOME 3 is a major concern. Now let's look at the laundry list of issues GNOME 3 gets wrong. ![]() Well, you just saw the short list of things that GNOME 3 got right.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |